[Youtube Review][BRIGHT SIDE] 10 Detective Riddles Only the Most Attentive 1% Can Solve

(Recommended)Popular Videos : [BRIGHT SIDE] 10 Detective Riddles Only the Most Attentive 1% Can Solve

 

This time, I will review the popular YouTube videos.

These days, even if it's good to watch on YouTube, sometimes people skip it or don't watch it if it's too long.

When you watch Youtube, do you scroll and read the comments first?

To save your busy time, why don't you check out the fun contents, summary, and empathy comments of popular YouTube videos first and watch YouTube?

(Recommended)Popular Videos : [BRIGHT SIDE] 10 Detective Riddles Only the Most Attentive 1% Can Solve

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fIaUK1fQwA

 

---

 

Summary Comments : [BRIGHT SIDE] 10 Detective Riddles Only the Most Attentive 1% Can Solve

Al*******:

All flaws in the riddles:
9. Hotel Room:
- the woman could have been suspicious because the man left towards the elevators.
- it is plausible that the man knocked because he was staying with someone and didn't have a key. I've knocked on my own hotel room door many times.

7. Ice Tea:
- the animations do not match up as there are no ice cubes depicted in the ice tea. So here we have to assume that the women have ice in their drink.

6. Mysterious death in the car:
- again, we have to assume information about the type of car, which does not make it a riddle.
- the man also could have been shot, then locked himself in his car before bleeding out.

5. Fly in coffee:
- how are we to know that she put sugar in her coffee? Are we supposed to guess? Because if we are supposed to assume that she likes sugar in her coffee, then that means we can also assume/guess other things like maybe there was a specific stain on the cup or lipstick on it that she recognized, or maybe she simply saw him bring back the same cup.

4, In court for killing the wife:
- this is by far the stupidest riddle... the riddle states "Everybody in the room, including the judge and jury, turns and looks at the door." This should include the man who killed his wife.

3. A case of a smuggler:
- how are we to assume that he doesn't smuggle clothes, or hats, or shoes into the country as he would be wearing them as well.
- plus, "smuggle" is not the correct word to use here. By definition, smuggling is the act of "moving (goods) illegally into or out of a country." It is not illegal to bring bikes in and out of countries, even if those bikes are stolen. This is a very misleading use of the word smuggle.

All the others are fine (although a little misleading).
Thanks for reading XD

 

---

 

Playtime Comments : [BRIGHT SIDE] 10 Detective Riddles Only the Most Attentive 1% Can Solve

Am******:

7:12 bruh you said everybody in the room

Ma*********:

Most of these riddles are missing serious details and logic. 4:15 for instance, could be based anywhere from the iced being a different temperature than the iced tea.

Mo******:

10:18 the voice says suspected but the word says suspended

At******************:

2:36 What if he was staying with someone and had forgot the keys.

On****************:

10:18 small error you said “suspected” but in your subtitles you wrote “suspended”

A*:

9:25 bc the caseete would of kept recording?? I dont know

he***:

5:50 I watched detective conan

Hi************:

00:10 "scientifically proen thst u must solve 10 detective riddles every day to exercise your brain"
Me who sometimes solves riddles
Among Us comes to the rescue boiss

An*******:

1:28 first of all
The snow didn't even break like what king of glass is that and then I don't think there is even any snow outside

Fe****:

10:22 Ughh! The man's a fool! When they said come to the crime scene, it was an obvious trap as they didn't tell you where the crime scene is!
That is the answer to the riddle..., right?

 

---

 

Top Comments : [BRIGHT SIDE] 10 Detective Riddles Only the Most Attentive 1% Can Solve

Ev*****:

Ok if everyone in the room looked at the door then how would they know the killer didn’t look at the door cause they’re all paying attention to the door and not what the killer is doing.

CH************:

Case 6: The man might had been shot first and then he tried to escape and get into the car but died of bleeding.

Va******:

Video : What does he smuggle?
Me : He smuggles sand.
Edit 1 : OMG! 870 likes! Thanks guys.. love ya :D

CA*******:

They don’t give enough information in most of them. And how would we know the lady put sugar in it?

Mi*********:

Wow So Many 1% That Solved Some Of This

Ap********:

firstly, quit using misleading graphics.
secondly, there's a difference between a riddle, and being bad at communication.

Ob****:

Who else lies to themselves by pretending to feel good when you "solve" a riddle you have heard before.

Ra**********************:

The one with the two girls and their ice teas I knew straight away about why the slowest girl died. I'm so proud of myself

Th***************:

10: detective lied there was no shattered glass on the inside meaning it was broken from the inside.
9: he lost his key and his wife was in his room the reason he knocked
8: the detectives never knew exactly what level he jumped from there for he could have just well jumped from the roof. Etc like the rest

Sh********:

Okay but you have to TELL US she put sugar in the coffee beforehand in order for it to be a fair riddle. We can't just assume that.

Bo***************:

I thought the answear lies on the tea temperature

Ca***:

For the second riddle, I have to argue that the answer was rather illogical.

There could have been someone in 'his' room that would have opened the door for him.

It was the fact that he said 'Wrong room' and went for the direction of the elevators instead of his room, which raised my suspicion. Anyone else agree?

ch************:

how did the guy in the car close the convertible top after being shot?

la********:

There’s not enough detail, especially the fly in the coffee, you should’ve said that she had previously put sugar in her coffee.

Lo***********:

Y did the lady put sugar even if it contained fly :p

De*************:

You should definitely give more information in the café scene.
You should say that she put sugar to the café, then in the One where the man jumped but closed the window thing:
Ehm...can I say that maybe he jumped from the roof.
Then other riddles were too easy.
Can u make another video with more difficult and with information

Ra*******:

i've seen all of the riddles earlier i can say you collected them

Ea**********:

8. Or he jumped from the roof...

Sh*******:

Bright Side:"OnlY tHe mOSt AtTenTiVE peOlPe caN SolVe tHem!"
Me: Watches 5 different riddle videoes, all sharing the same riddle
WAIT A MINUTE

Re************:

What if he didnt wanted to reveal his identity and putted question mark on the note

jh*****:

The man could have jumped off the roof.

Ky*********:

Most of these riddles are missing the details that the answer bases itself on

Be******:

Who tf smuggles bicycles?

Bo*******:

Could’ve told us it was a convertible...

Ro**********:

Got 7 of them right but still some of them were absurd and not clearly stated and could possibly have different sensible explainions.

To********:

Moral of the story: dont name your kid question mark

ta*************:

watch me get them all wrong and lie about it

BL********:

It's not fair to have a riddle that leaves out important information. Like the guy with the gunshot wound in his car. If you leave out the information about what kind of car it is, the only way you can get that question right is if you simply guess. But when a riddle is designed to make someone guess it becomes unfair as there are too many possibilities. Also, My guess was that he was shot, but survived, got in his car and then bled out after locking himself inside, attempting to get further away. Which is just as good a possibility as the car being a convertible. Both answers are completely plausible, therefore no detective could possibly conclude that there is not entry point in the car because the roof was down, as there are many other possibilities, which again, makes this riddle unfair.

Same with the riddle of the fly in the coffee, how are we to know that she put sugar in her coffee? Are we supposed to guess? Because if we are supposed to assume that she likes sugar in her coffee, then that means we can also assume/guess other things like maybe there was a specific stain on the cup that she recognized, or maybe the fly was still in it, or maybe she simply saw him bring back the same cup.

When riddles intentionally leave out information that is key to the answer, it makes the riddle unfair and in my opinion, is no longer a riddle worthy of deduction. If you read this I thank you, even if this comment gets no replies I hope someone reads it because these so called "riddles" really annoy me.

Ha****:

Half of these are missing the necessary information.
How are we supposed to know the lady put sugar in her coffee?
Are we supposed to assume the cops said literally "Your wife is murdered, you need to meet us at the crime scene" without telling the guy where it was?
Etc. Etc.

Granted, these are good brain teasers, but presenting it in the form of "Are you smart enough to solve the riddle?" Then giving us missing information so it's impossible to get some right, then questioning "How many did you get right?" sounds like you want people to feel like idiots.

 

---

 

[BRIGHT SIDE] We gathered comments about popular videos and looked at them in summary, including play time, and order of popularity.

It's a good video or channel, but if you're sad because it's too long, please leave a YouTube channel or video link and I'll post it on this blog.

 

---